TrustVerify logoTrustVerify
Decorative footer background
TrustVerify logoTrustVerify

Identity and business verification for UK marketplaces. ID document and selfie checks, UK company and director checks, and a recorded decision on every check.

020 4542 7323

Solutions

  • All solutions
  • Identity (IDV/KYC)
  • Business (KYB)
  • Bot detection
  • AML & PEP screening
  • Seller verification (KYS)
  • UK registry checks
  • Ongoing monitoring
  • Review queue & trust score
  • Fraud checks
  • IP geolocation
  • Email validation
  • Escrow (secure transactions)

Industries

  • Marketplaces

Developers

  • Platform
  • Integrations
  • Developer docs
  • API reference
  • Webhooks
  • Changelog
  • API status
  • Help centre

Blog

  • All articles
  • Glossary
  • Compare
  • Sumsub alternatives
  • Onfido alternatives
  • Veriff alternatives

Company

  • About TrustVerify
  • Careers
  • Contact sales
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookie policy
  • Terms of service

© 2026 Magnificentech Solutions Ltd (Company No. 16321180), trading as TrustVerify. Registered in England & Wales. All rights reserved. · trustverify.co.uk

TrustVerify, Willow Farm, Choppington, Northumberland NE62 5EU · 020 4542 7323

  1. Blog/
  2. Compliance/
  3. Ongoing Monitoring: Why a One-Off Seller Check Goes Stale
Compliance

Ongoing Monitoring: Why a One-Off Seller Check Goes Stale

Why sanctions and PEP checks at onboarding go stale, how ongoing monitoring works for marketplace sellers and what to do when an alert arrives.

Ayodele Michael Omotayo avatar
Ayodele Michael Omotayo
Founder & CEO, TrustVerify · 31 October 2026 · 6 min read

Most marketplaces screen sellers once. The seller signs up, their name is checked against sanctions and PEP lists, the result is clear, and the seller starts trading. That check is then treated as true for as long as the account exists.

It is not. A screening result describes one moment. The lists change, people's roles change, and a seller who was clear in January can be a match in June. This post explains why one-off checks go stale, how ongoing monitoring works, and how to handle the alerts it produces.

This is general information, not legal advice. For your own screening obligations, see GOV.UK guidance and take professional advice.

Why a clear result does not stay clear

Three things change after onboarding:

The lists change. Sanctions designations are added, amended and removed. In the UK, the UK Sanctions List has been the only source for UK sanctions designations since 28 January 2026, and it is updated as designations change. A name that was not on it at signup can be added later.

People's positions change. A politically exposed person (PEP) is someone in a prominent public role, or closely connected to one. People are elected, appointed and promoted. A seller can become a PEP, or become connected to one, long after onboarding.

Your sellers change. A company seller can appoint new directors or change owners. The person you screened may no longer be the person in control.

None of this is visible if you only check once.

The options: periodic or continuous

There are two broad ways to keep screening current.

Periodic re-screening. You re-check every seller on a schedule, say annually, or more often for higher-risk sellers. This is simple, but it leaves gaps. A seller added to a list the day after their annual check stays unnoticed for almost a year.

Continuous monitoring. Each seller is enrolled once, re-screened automatically on a short cycle, and you are only told when something new appears. The gap shrinks from months to about a day, and your team sees changes rather than repeat results.

For sellers you depend on, sellers who receive payouts, or sellers in higher-risk categories, continuous monitoring is usually the better fit.

How TrustVerify monitoring works

TrustVerify's ongoing monitoring, available on selected plans, is built around a few deliberate design choices. The monitoring API reference has the detail.

Enrol once, re-screen daily. You enrol a subject with POST /api/v1/aml/monitor, passing your own reference, the name and, ideally, date of birth and country. TrustVerify screens them straight away and then re-screens them every day.

A real baseline, or no monitor. The first screen is the baseline the daily checks compare against. If that first screen cannot be completed, no monitor is created and you get an error. That avoids a monitor with an unknown starting point, which would report every existing listing as "new".

Only new matches alert. When a daily re-screen finds a match that was not there before, it is delivered once as an aml.hit webhook event. A changed caption or score on an existing match does not trigger a repeat alert.

Monitoring you can check. Listing your monitors shows when each subject was last screened and how many re-screens in a row have failed. You can verify monitoring is running, rather than taking it on trust.

Suspension is visible. If monitoring stops for a subject, for example because the account plan has lapsed, you are told with the aml.monitor.suspended event. A suspended monitor keeps its record so it can resume.

Adding a date of birth matters more than it looks. Without it, a common name can match the same unrelated list entry every day.

What to do when an alert arrives

An alert is a possible match, not a conclusion. A simple handling process:

  1. Check the match. Compare date of birth, nationality and other details with what you hold on the seller.
  2. If it is not the same person, record why and close it.
  3. If it might be, pause payouts and new listings while it is reviewed.
  4. If it is confirmed, escalate to whoever owns sanctions compliance, follow GOV.UK guidance on what to do next, and do not tip off the seller.

Write this down before the first alert. A reviewer on a Friday afternoon should not be making it up. Our post on designing a fraud review queue covers how to route these cases without building a backlog. [Planned URL, live on publication.]

Who to monitor

You do not have to monitor everyone. A proportionate approach for many marketplaces:

  • Always: sellers receiving payouts above a set level, company sellers' directors, and sellers in higher-risk categories.
  • Consider: owners of company sellers (people with significant control), and long-standing high-volume sellers.
  • Probably not: buyers who only browse, or one-off low-value sellers, unless your obligations say otherwise.

When a seller leaves the platform, stop monitoring them. Keeping a monitor on someone you no longer have a relationship with is hard to justify under data protection principles. [Planned URL, live on publication.]

Connecting monitoring to your systems

Monitoring is only useful if alerts reach someone who can act. In practice:

  • Register a webhook endpoint and verify every delivery's signature. Our post on KYC webhooks and decision handling explains how.
  • Map aml.hit to a review case and a payout hold in your own system.
  • Map aml.monitor.suspended to an alert for your compliance owner, because silence after suspension is not the same as clear.
  • Check monitor health weekly using the last-screened time.

Common mistakes

Treating monitoring as a box ticked. Enrolling sellers is the start. Someone has to own the alerts and check that monitoring is still running.

Enrolling without dates of birth. It produces repeat noise on common names and trains reviewers to dismiss alerts.

No plan for a real match. The first confirmed match is the worst time to decide who does what.

Never removing anyone. Stop monitoring sellers who have left, and record when and why.

Ignoring company changes. If a company seller appoints a new director, the new person needs screening too. Monitoring the old director does not cover them.

Key takeaways

If you only remember a few points from this post, make them these:

  • A clear screening result describes one moment, not the future.
  • Lists, roles and company ownership all change after onboarding.
  • Continuous monitoring cuts the gap from months to about a day.
  • Add dates of birth to reduce repeat noise.
  • Treat suspension as needing action, not as clear.
  • Write the alert-handling process before the first alert arrives.

None of these points requires a large team or a long project. Most can be put in place in a few weeks, and each one makes the next decision easier to explain.

Re-screening starts from a good first check: see our KYC software for UK businesses and the guide to choosing KYC software in the UK.

Next step

See how ongoing monitoring fits alongside onboarding checks. Explore TrustVerify ongoing monitoring.

Frequently asked questions

What is ongoing PEP monitoring?
Re-screening people you have already checked, automatically and regularly, and alerting only when a new sanctions, PEP or watchlist match appears.
How often does TrustVerify re-screen?
Enrolled subjects are re-screened daily, and new matches are sent as an `aml.hit` webhook event.
Why does monitoring need a date of birth?
It narrows matches. Without it, common names can match unrelated list entries on every re-screen.
What happens if monitoring stops?
TrustVerify sends an `aml.monitor.suspended` event and the monitor keeps its record. Treat suspension as needing action, not as a clear result.
Is annual re-screening enough?
It depends on your risk and obligations. Annual checks can leave a seller unnoticed for months after being listed. Continuous monitoring shortens that gap.

See TrustVerify in action

KYC, KYB, AML screening and fraud prevention in one place, with published pricing.

Book a 30-minute demoSee pricingRead the API docs
Ayodele Michael Omotayo avatar

Ayodele Michael Omotayo

Founder & CEO, TrustVerify

Founder and CEO of TrustVerify. Building identity and business verification for UK marketplaces, with every decision recorded.

LinkedIn →

Related posts

Cover image: Verification Evidence Bundles for Audits and Bank Queries

Compliance

Verification Evidence Bundles for Audits and Bank Queries

How marketplaces can prepare verification evidence for an audit, bank or partner query: what to keep, how to package it and how to show it is unchanged.

Cover image: Sanctions Screening for Business Sellers and Their Owners

KYB

Sanctions Screening for Business Sellers and Their Owners

How marketplaces can screen business sellers, directors and owners against sanctions lists, handle possible matches and keep screening current.

Cover image: Integrating KYC via API into Marketplace Seller Onboarding

Developer

Integrating KYC via API into Marketplace Seller Onboarding

How to add ID and selfie checks to marketplace seller onboarding with a KYC API: capture, the verify call, reading results and handling outcomes.

On this page

  • Why a clear result does not stay clear
  • The options: periodic or continuous
  • How TrustVerify monitoring works
  • What to do when an alert arrives
  • Who to monitor
  • Connecting monitoring to your systems
  • Common mistakes
  • Key takeaways
  • Next step